Why the Urge to Fix Everyone Might Be the Real Problem

Category:

If you’ve ever had a boss, teacher, or system try to bring out your “best” by squeezing you into a mold, this ancient Daoist chapter will feel weirdly familiar.

It’s called “Horses’ Hooves” (Ma Ti, 马蹄). It comes from the Outer Chapters of the Zhuangzi. Most scholars think the Outer Chapters weren’t written by Zhuangzi himself, but by later writers in his tradition. Still, the message is classic Daoism:

Forcing everyone into the same shape doesn’t improve them. It wrecks them.

This chapter is a fierce little parable about horses, potters, carpenters, and politicians – and why the people who claim to be “fixing” the world are often the ones breaking it.

The Horse Already Knew How to Live

Zhuangzi starts with a simple question: What is a horse’s true nature?

A horse has hooves for walking on frost and snow. It has hair for protection against wind and cold. It eats grass, drinks water, and when it’s happy, it jumps and kicks.

That’s it. That’s the horse’s life.

It doesn’t need a palace. It doesn’t need a fancy stable. It doesn’t need a career plan.

Zhuangzi calls this the horse’s constant nature – its natural way of being.

The horse is already fine.

Then someone shows up to “help.”

Bo Le: The Original Horse “Expert”

Bo Le is the legendary horse trainer of ancient China. He says, “I am good at training horses.”

How does he do it?

He burns them, brands them, clips them, carves them. He puts on bridles, hobbles, and halters. He locks them in stables and feeds them on a schedule.

By that point, Zhuangzi says, two or three out of ten horses are already dead.

Then Bo Le starves them, thirsts them, gallops them, whips them, and lines them up. With bits in their mouths and whips at their backs, more than half the horses are dead.

Zhuangzi’s point isn’t really about horse training. It’s about governance, education, and management.

When someone says, “I know how to handle this,” what they often mean is:

“I know how to force this into my idea of what it should be.”

The Potter, the Carpenter, and the Tyranny of the Ruler and Square

Next, Zhuangzi brings in the potter and the carpenter.

The potter says: “I’m good at working clay. I make it round with a compass and square with a ruler.”

The carpenter says: “I’m good at working wood. I bend it with a hook and straighten it with an ink line.”

But did the clay ask to be round? Did the wood ask to be straight?

No.

Yet everyone praises these craftsmen. And everyone praises the rulers who do the same thing to people.

Zhuangzi’s target is any system that says:

“This is the correct shape. Everyone must fit it.”

That’s not governance. That’s forced conformity.

What Good Government Actually Looks Like

So what would a good ruler do?

Zhuangzi says people have a constant nature too. They weave clothes and wear them. They farm food and eat it. They live together without forming factions. This is called Heavenly Freedom (天放, tian fang).

In the age of Perfect Virtue, people walked steadily and saw simply. There were no tunnels cut through mountains or bridges built over water. All living things grew together. Birds and beasts lived in flocks. Grass and trees flourished.

Humans could lead animals around, climb up to bird nests, and live side by side with other creatures. They didn’t even know the difference between “gentleman” and “small man.”

They were without knowledge – but not stupid. They were without desire – but not dead.

They weren’t split by cleverness. They weren’t yanked around by external things.

That’s the Daoist version of paradise: not a city of philosophers, but a world where no one has been cut in half by ambition.

Then the Sages Showed Up

And then – according to Zhuangzi – the “sages” arrived.

They strained to talk about benevolence. They stood on tiptoe to preach righteousness. Suddenly, the world became confused.

They invented elaborate music and fussy rituals. Suddenly, the world became divided.

Zhuangzi asks a series of sharp questions:

  • If raw wood is never carved, who needs sacrificial cups?
  • If white jade is never broken, who needs jade tablets?
  • If the Way and virtue are not abandoned, who needs benevolence?
  • If your nature is not scattered, who needs rituals and music?
  • If the five colors are not confused, who needs decoration?
  • If the five notes are not confused, who needs pitch pipes?

His answer is brutal:

Carving up raw wood to make tools is the craftsman’s crime.
Destroying virtue to make benevolence is the sage’s fault.

Now, Zhuangzi is not saying kindness is evil. He’s saying that benevolence and rituals are emergency medicine. You only need them when something has already gone wrong.

The mistake is turning emergency medicine into the highest ideal – and then forcing everyone to swallow it.

The Horse Learns to Fight Back

Here’s where the horse story comes back.

A horse, left alone, eats grass, drinks water, nuzzles its friends, and kicks when it’s angry. That’s all it knows.

But once you put a harness on it, a bit in its mouth, and a bridle on its head, the horse learns new skills:

  • It eyes you sideways.
  • It twists its neck.
  • It bucks and bolts.
  • It spits out the bit.
  • It chews through the reins.

Where did the horse learn to be so cunning and rebellious?

Zhuangzi says: That’s Bo Le’s fault.

The more you force a creature, the more it learns to resist. The more complicated your control, the more creative its escape.

This is a lesson every manager, parent, and government should tattoo on their forehead.

The Age of Hexu

Zhuangzi ends with a glimpse of the age of Hexu, a legendary ancient ruler.

In those days, people didn’t know what they were doing. They didn’t know where they were going. They played with their food, patted their full bellies, and wandered around.

That was enough.

Then the sages came. They used rituals and music to “correct” people’s bodies. They lifted up benevolence and righteousness to “comfort” people’s hearts.

And what happened?

People started straining after knowledge. They started competing for profit. And once that started, there was no stopping it.

Zhuangzi says: That’s the sages’ fault too.

What Zhuangzi Is Not Saying

It’s easy to misread this chapter as:

  • “Rules are bad.”
  • “Morality is fake.”
  • “Just do whatever you want.”

That’s not it.

Zhuangzi is not against kindness. He’s against performative kindness.
He’s not against order. He’s against forced order.
He’s not against improvement. He’s against improvement that destroys the thing it’s trying to improve.

His real target is alienation – when systems, standards, and moral ideals become so heavy that they replace your natural life.

He wants neither the wild hedonist nor the rigid moral robot.

He wants a person who is rooted, genuine, and free.

Why This Still Matters Today

This chapter reads like a critique of modern life.

We live in a world of scoreboards:

  • Grades.
  • KPIs.
  • Followers.
  • Status.
  • Productivity.
  • Moral purity.
  • Personal branding.

We take children and treat them like clay. We take workers and treat them like horses. We take human beings and ask them to fit a template that was never theirs.

Zhuangzi’s question is simple:

Is this your actual nature?
Or are you performing someone else’s idea of who you should be?

The best teacher doesn’t force every student into the same shape.
The best boss doesn’t break people to fit a spreadsheet.
The best ruler doesn’t make a whole society sick just to keep it orderly.

A good world lets a horse be a horse, a person be a person, and a thing be what it is.

Share this:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *