The Body, Shadow, and Spirit is a series of five-character-per-line poems. The first poem features the Body addressing the Shadow: while the physical forms of heaven, earth, mountains, and rivers endure forever, and grass and trees can regenerate even after withering, the human body is destined to die and vanish. Therefore, one should seize the moment to drink wine and enjoy life. The second poem is the Shadow’s reply to the Body: since eternal life is impossible and the realm of immortals is completely out of reach, it is far nobler to strive to establish moral virtue and leave a legacy for future generations than to indulge in wine and fleeting pleasures. The third poem features the Spirit resolving the anxieties and differing viewpoints of the Body and the Shadow. The Spirit argues that the illusion of immortality is unreliable and that death is inevitable; however, drinking shortens one’s lifespan, and doing good deeds will leave no one to offer praise after one is gone. Excessive worry over life and death only harms one’s own vitality. Thus, it is best to simply follow nature, view these matters with philosophical equanimity, and not overthink them.
In these three poems, the “Body” represents humanity’s desire for eternal life, the “Shadow” represents the desire to do good and establish a reputation, and the “Spirit” uses the principles of nature to alleviate their distress. The poem employs a dialectical format where the words of the Body and Shadow provoke the Spirit’s philosophical discourse, articulating the viewpoints of each entity. These three can be seen as three alter egos of Tao Yuanming, representing the three contradictory aspects of his own psyche. Their dialogue reflects the conflicts and harmonizations within his philosophy of life. The entire series is written in a plain, clear, vivid, and intimate style, resembling a casual conversation among family.
The relationship between the physical form (Body) and the spirit (Spirit) is a crucial proposition in Chinese philosophy. This is extensively discussed in Lao-Zhuang (Daoist) philosophy. For example, the Wenzi quotes Laozi: “The highest virtue nourishes the spirit; the next best nourishes the form.” The Huainanzi (淮南子) states: “When the spirit is the master, the form follows and benefits; when the form is the master, the spirit follows and suffers.” These texts establish the concept that the spirit is primary and the form is secondary, with the spirit being more valuable. They also emphasize the inseparable bond between the two. The Huainanzi notes: “The form is the dwelling of life; qi (vital energy) is the fullness of life; the spirit is the governor of life. If any one loses its proper place, all three are harmed.” This indicates that while form,qi, and spirit each have distinct functions, they are interconnected and indispensable. Similarly, Sima Tan (司马谈), an early Han scholar who promoted Huang-Lao thought, wrote in his Essay on the Core Ideas of the Six Schools: “What gives man life is the spirit; what houses it is the form. If the spirit is overused, it exhausts; if the form is overworked, it deteriorates. When the form and spirit separate, death occurs.” This directly asserts the unity of form and spirit, reflecting the naive materialism within Lao-Zhuang philosophy.
However, with the rise of Buddhism, Buddhist monks advocated the idealistic concept that “the form perishes, but the spirit does not perish” and that the soul is eternal. Huiyuan, a Buddhist monk contemporary to Tao, wrote On the Imperishability of the Spirit When the Form Perishes (形尽神不灭论) and Inscription on the Buddha’s Shadow (佛影铭) to elaborate this theory. The Inscription states: “Vast is the great image; its profound truth is nameless. Embodying the spirit, one enters transformation; the shadow falls away, separating from the form.” This was intended to promote the idea that the spirit and form are separate and independent. This perspective on the relationship between the form, shadow, and spirit represented the Buddhist understanding of the physical body and the mind, exerting widespread influence in the intellectual circles of the time. Huiyuan once instructed his disciple Dao Bing (道秉) to travel to the Jiangdong region to invite Xie Lingyun, a famous writer deeply influenced by Buddhism, to compose an inscription for a stone monument. Tao Yuanming’s series of poems was written against this very backdrop.
Huiyuan and Tao Yuanming also had personal ties. In 414 CE, Huiyuan gathered 123 people at the Donglin Temple on Mount Lu to form the White Lotus Society to study Buddhism. He invited Tao to join, but Tao “knitted his brows and left,” indicating a clear divergence in their scholarly interests and philosophical views. Their short dialogue was recorded in this post.
Tao’s understanding of this issue was fundamentally rooted in the Daoist concept of nature, as he explained in his preface. He believed that ordinary people, regardless of wealth or intelligence, frantically clinging to life was a profound delusion. Therefore, he exhaustively described the suffering of the Body and Shadow, using the Spirit to elucidate the principles of nature and dispel people’s doubts. He highlighted the word “nature” (自然) to establish the foundation of his argument. The Daodejing states: “Man models himself on earth, earth on heaven, heaven on the Dao, and the Dao on nature.” Since taking nature as the ultimate model is the core of Daoism, this reveals the intellectual wellspring of Tao’s thought. In this series, he uses the dialogue among the Body, Shadow, and Spirit to express his views.
Through these three poems, Tao articulated his philosophy of life, making them essential for understanding his lifelong ideology. According to Chen Yinke’s The Relationship Between Tao Yuanming’s Thought and Pure Conversation, Tao steadfastly adhered to the Way of the Celestial Masters (Tianshi Dao) faith revered by his ancestors. Thus, he used the Daoist view of nature as his foundation. He differed from the Wei-Jin nature-worshippers who indulged in mountains and rivers and sought immortality through alchemy, such as Ji Kang and Ruan Ji. He also differed from those who revered Confucius and Mencius and championed traditional moral codes, such as He Zeng. Influenced by both Lao-Zhuang thought and the social realities of the transition between the Jin and Song dynasties, Tao created a “New Theory of Nature,” which is typically embodied in the Body, Shadow, and Spirit series. Therefore, this poem not only reflects Tao’s personal philosophy but is also of immense significance for understanding the evolution of the political thoughts and concepts of life among the scholar-officials from the late Cao Wei to the Eastern Jin periods.
According to this interpretation,The Body Speaks to the Shadow mimics and critiques the “Old Theory of Nature.” Its main point – that human life is fleeting compared to the eternity of nature – reflects the view held by Ji Kang and Ruan Ji. Proponents of the Old Theory mostly sought longevity and immortality. Tao’s line, “I possess no magic to ascend and transform; this inevitable end is beyond doubt,” clearly demonstrates his stance against the pursuit of immortality. Furthermore, those who revered nature during the Wei-Jin period often sought liberation through wine to survive in a chaotic world, as seen with Ruan Ji and Liu Ling. Tao mimics this view in his line, “When wine is offered, do not casually refuse it.”
The Shadow Replies to the Body adopts the tone of the proponents of moral codes to criticize the Old Theory of Nature and propose an alternative view of life. It first points out that immortality is unattainable and the realm of immortals is inaccessible, intending to accuse the proponents of nature of nihilism and absurdity. It argues that life and death are impermanent, and the form and shadow are inseparable; once one leaves the world, both vanish, and the name perishes with the body. Therefore, they advocate achieving immortality through establishing virtue and leaving a name, hoping to achieve eternity through spiritual legacy. This idea is derived from the Confucian concept of the “Three Immortalities” (establishing virtue, merit, and words). Believing that a good name can last for eternity, they are dissatisfied with the attitude of drowning sorrows in wine and advocate pursuing posthumous fame.
The Spirit Explains embodies Tao’s “New Theory of Nature.” Through the Spirit, Tao criticizes the Body (representing the Old Theory of Nature) and the Shadow (representing the moral codes). Lines like “Where are the great sage-kings of antiquity now?” and “Doing good deeds is indeed a joyful pursuit, but who will be left to praise your name after you are gone?” intend to refute the proponents of moral codes who claim that virtue leads to immortality. The six lines following “Pengzu, who loved his long life” dismantle the Old Theory’s arguments for immortality and drunken escapism. Finally, the Spirit proposes “riding the great waves of cosmic transformation” and following nature, making the individual a part of nature without needing magical arts to ascend. In this way, one can preserve the spirit, remain unperished even in death, and coexist with heaven and earth.
Tao’s advocacy of merging mysteriously with nature and becoming one with creation is derived from Lao-Zhuang philosophy. The Zhuangzi states: “He who grasps the Dao has complete virtue; with complete virtue, the form is complete; with a complete form, the spirit is complete. This is the way of the sage.” This fully affirms the importance of the spirit while establishing it on the foundation of complete virtue and form, emphasizing the unity of spirit, form, and virtue (the “Shadow” in this poem). Tao’s equal treatment of the wise and foolish, and the long-lived and short-lived, is entirely rooted in Zhuangzi. Thus, Fang Dongshu (方东树) noted in Zhao Mei Zhan Yan (《昭昧詹言》) that the core theme of Tao’s poetry originates from the Zhuangzi.
Tao’s view on form and spirit differs significantly from that of Buddhists. He believed in their mutual dependence and unity. The Spirit Explains states that they “depend on each other in life” and “are joyfully united in their bond.” This is similar to the views of the later materialist thinker Fan Zhen, who argued in his treatise Shenmie Lun(“On the Annihilation of the Spirit” 神灭论): “The form is the substance of the spirit; the spirit is the function of the form… The form and the spirit cannot be different.” Fan Zhen also stated: “The spirit is the form, and the form is the spirit; therefore, when the form exists, the spirit exists; when the form perishes, the spirit perishes.” In this sense, Tao Yuanming can be considered a pioneer of Fan Zhen, as his views on the form and spirit contain elements of naive materialism.
Artistically, this poem is highly distinctive. It employs an allegorical format, using the mutual Q&A among the Body, Shadow, and Spirit to unfold its arguments. This imaginative approach makes the philosophical discussion lively and engaging, while maintaining the unique personality of each allegorical figure even during logical reasoning. For instance, the Body says to the Shadow, “I only wish you would take my words to heart: when wine is offered, do not casually refuse it.” This sounds exactly like a host urging a friend not to decline a drink. Later, Li Bai’s lines in Drinking Alone Under the Moon, “I raise my cup to invite the bright moon, and with my shadow, we become a party of three. Yet the moon does not understand the joy of drinking, and my shadow merely tags along, a silent follower,” clearly draw inspiration from Tao’s poem. Similarly, the Shadow says, “I truly wished to roam the peaks of Kunlun and Mount Hua, but that path is distant and entirely cut off.” Since a shadow lacks the ability to move independently, the word “wished” perfectly illustrates that its desire to become an immortal is merely an unattainable fantasy. Furthermore, the lines “Since you and I first met, we have never differed in sorrow or joy” vividly depict the inseparable nature of the form and shadow, capturing the scene with remarkable precision.
Leave a Reply