Han Feizi – Chapter 30.9

During the reign of Duke Ling of Wei, Mi Zixia was highly favored and monopolized power in the state. A dwarf once had an audience with the Duke and said, “My dream has come true.” The Duke asked, “What did you dream?” He replied, “I dreamed of a stove, which means I am about to see Your Lordship.” The Duke was angered and said, “I have heard that those who seek an audience with a ruler dream of the sun. Why did you dream of a stove when seeking to see me?” The dwarf replied, “The sun illuminates the entire world and cannot be blocked by a single object. A ruler illuminates the entire state and cannot be obstructed by a single person. Therefore, those who seek an audience with a ruler dream of the sun. As for a stove, if one person stands in front of it to warm himself, the people behind him will be completely blocked from its light. Perhaps there is someone currently warming himself in front of Your Lordship? If so, is it not entirely appropriate that I dreamed of a stove?”

Duke Ai of Lu asked Confucius, “There is a vulgar proverb that says, ‘Without the multitude, one becomes lost.’ Now, whenever I undertake an affair, I deliberate with all my ministers, yet my state grows more chaotic. Why is this?” Confucius replied, “When a wise ruler consults his ministers, some know the truth while others do not. In this way, the wise ruler sits above, and the ministers below speak their minds directly. But now, not a single minister in Lu dares to speak differently from the private dictates of the Ji clan. The entire state has been transformed into a single voice. Even if you consult everyone within your borders, you cannot avoid chaos.”

In another account, when Yan Ying visited Lu, Duke Ai asked him the same question. Yan Zi replied, “The ancients who said ‘without three people, one becomes lost’ meant that if one misses it, two may get it, and three are enough to form a multitude. But today, the thousands of ministers in Lu all speak according to the private interests of the Ji clan. Though the number of people is indeed large, the voice is but one. How can this be called three?”

A man of Qi said to the King of Qi, “The River God is a great deity. Why does Your Majesty not try to meet him? I will arrange this meeting for you.” So, an altar was built on the water, and the King stood upon it. After a while, a large fish moved in the water, and the man said, “This is the River God.”

Zhang Yi wanted to use the combined forces of Qin, Han, and Wei to attack Qi and Chu, while Hui Shi wanted to make peace with Qi and Chu. The two debated fiercely. All the ministers favored Zhang Yi and believed attacking was beneficial; none supported Hui Shi. The King indeed listened to Zhang Yi and rejected Hui Shi’s advice. After the decision to attack was finalized, Hui Shi requested an audience. The King said, “Sir, do not speak further. The matter of attacking Qi and Chu is indeed beneficial; the entire state agrees.” Hui Shi replied, “This must be examined carefully. If attacking Qi and Chu is truly beneficial, and the entire state agrees, how is it that we have so many wise men? If it is truly not beneficial, yet the entire state agrees, how is it that we have so many fools? In all planning, there must be doubt. True doubt means half believe it is feasible, and half believe it is not. Now, if the entire state agrees it is feasible, Your Majesty has lost half of the perspective. Those who hijack a ruler always ensure he loses half of his perspective.”

Shusun (Uncle Sun) served as Prime Minister of Lu. He was noble and made all decisions. His son and favorite servant, Shu Niu, also arbitrarily wielded Shusun’s orders. Uncle Sun had a son named Ren. Shu Niu, jealous of him, wanted to kill him. Once, when Ren was at the Duke of Lu’s court, the Duke gifted him a jade ring. Ren bowed and accepted it but dared not wear it, asking Shu Niu to request permission from Uncle Sun. Shu Niu deceived him, saying, “I have already asked for you; he told you to wear it.” Ren then wore it. Shu Niu then told Uncle Sun, “Why have you not presented Ren to the Duke?” Uncle Sun said, “What is a mere boy worth presenting?” Shu Niu replied, “Ren has already been presented to the Duke several times. The Duke gifted him a jade ring, and Ren is already wearing it.” When Uncle Sun summoned Ren and saw him wearing the ring, he was enraged and killed Ren. Ren’s elder brother, Bing, was also envied by Shu Niu, who wanted to kill him too. When Uncle Sun cast a bell for Bing, Bing dared not strike it and asked Shu Niu to request permission. Shu Niu did not ask but deceived him, saying, “I have already asked; he told you to strike it.” Bing then struck it. Hearing this, Uncle Sun said, “Bing struck the bell without permission.” Enraged, he exiled him. Bing fled to Qi. A year later, Shu Niu apologized to Uncle Sun on Bing’s behalf. Uncle Sun told Shu Niu to summon him. Shu Niu did not summon him but reported, “I have summoned him, but Bing is furious and refuses to come.” Uncle Sun was furious and sent someone to kill him. After both sons were dead, Uncle Sun fell ill. Shu Niu exclusively nursed him, dismissed all attendants, and kept visitors out, claiming, “Uncle Sun does not wish to hear human voices.” He then stopped feeding him and starved him to death. After Uncle Sun died, Shu Niu did not announce the mourning, emptied the treasury of its precious treasures, and fled to Qi. When a ruler listens only to the words of those he trusts, fathers and sons are murdered by others. This is the disaster of failing to cross-reference information.

Jiang Yi, serving as an envoy from the King of Wei to Chu, said to the King of Chu, “Upon entering your territory, I heard a local custom: ‘A noble man does not conceal the good deeds of others, nor speak of their evil deeds.’ Is this true?” The King said, “It is.” Jiang Yi replied, “Then in the rebellion of Duke Bai, your state should have been safe from danger. If this custom truly prevails, I am exempt from the crime of death.”

Duke Si of Wei valued Ru Er and loved Consort Shi, but feared they would use his affection to block his vision. Thus, he elevated Bo Yi to rival Ru Er, and Consort Wei to rival Consort Shi, saying, “This is how I cross-reference them.” Duke Si knew he wanted to avoid being blocked, but he did not grasp the true method. If he does not allow low-ranking officials to criticize high-ranking ones, the lower officials will surely be punished. If he waits until the rival factions are equally powerful before daring to discuss affairs, he is merely planting more blocking officials. Duke Si’s obstruction had only just begun.

If arrows come from a specific direction, one can pile up iron to defend that direction. If arrows come from all directions, one must build an iron chamber to defend completely. With complete defense, the body remains unharmed. Thus, complete defense prevents physical harm, and complete cross-referencing prevents treachery.

Pang Gong, accompanying the Crown Prince as a hostage to Handan, said to the King of Wei, “If one person says there is a tiger in the marketplace, does Your Majesty believe it?” The King said, “No.” “If two people say there is a tiger, does Your Majesty believe it?” The King said, “No.” “If three people say there is a tiger, does Your Majesty believe it?” The King said, “I believe it.” Pang Gong said, “It is obvious that there is no tiger in the marketplace, yet when three people say so, it becomes a tiger. Now, Handan is farther from Wei than the marketplace, and those who slander me will number more than three. I pray Your Majesty examines this carefully.” When Pang Gong returned from Handan, he was indeed never granted an audience.

Note

This excerpt comes from “Explanation One” in Han Feizi · Inner Congeries of Sayings I. It states rulers must never rely on a single information source. Multi‑party cross‑checks should break ministers’ information monopoly. Otherwise, the ruler will be deceived by confidants and reduced to a manipulated puppet.

Mi Zixia:

Mi Zixia was a favored courtier of Duke Ling of Wei in the Spring‑and‑Autumn Period. He gained the ruler’s deep affection through the famous “peach of shared taste” anecdote. Yet once his beauty faded, the very deeds once praised by the duke were turned into crimes against him. His story illustrates how subjective royal favor is fickle and unreliable.

The Dwarf’s Dream of a Stove:

A brilliant allegory for information monopoly. The sun represents an enlightened ruler with multiple information channels; the stove represents a blinded ruler obscured by a single favored minister.

Duke Ai of Lu and the Ji Clan:

The Ji clan was the powerful aristocratic family that effectively controlled the State of Lu. Duke Ai was a puppet ruler. Han Fei uses this to illustrate that “consensus” is meaningless if it is manufactured by a single power center.

Zhang Yi vs. Hui Shi:

Zhang Yi (张仪) was a famous Legalist/Diplomat advocating for aggressive expansion, while Hui Shi (惠施) was a philosopher/logician advocating for peace. Han Fei uses Hui Shi’s argument (“if everyone agrees, you’ve lost half the perspective”) to emphasize that dissent is a necessary component of strategic planning.

Shu Niu Starving Shusun:

Shusun Bao (叔孙豹) was a prominent minister of Lu, Shu Niu (竖牛) was one of his sons. This gruesome story is the ultimate cautionary tale against relying on a single, trusted intermediary for communication and decision-making.

Duke Si’s Rival Factions:

Duke Si (卫嗣) tried to prevent being blocked by creating two equally powerful, rival factions, Ru Er (如耳) and Bo Yi (薄疑). Han Fei criticizes this as naive: without empowering lower-level officials to speak freely, creating top-level rivals just creates a bigger bottleneck.

Pang Gong (庞恭) and the Tiger in the Marketplace:

This is the origin of the famous Chinese idiom “三人成虎” (Three men make a tiger). It perfectly captures the danger of information cascades and confirmation bias: if multiple sources repeat a lie, the ruler will inevitably believe it unless he actively cross-references.

Cross-Referencing and Verification:

The core Legalist intelligence-gathering method. It means triangulating information from multiple, independent sources to find the objective truth.

The Disaster of Failing to Cross-Reference:

The fatal flaw of rulers who rely on single channels of communication, leading to manipulation, tragedy, and state ruin.

Iron Chamber:

A metaphor for comprehensive, multi-directional intelligence gathering. A ruler must not assume threats come from only one direction.

说一

卫灵公之时,弥子瑕有宠,专于卫国。侏儒有见公者曰:”臣之梦践矣。”公曰:”何梦?”对曰:”梦见灶,为见公也。”公怒曰:”吾闻见人主者梦见日,奚为见寡人而梦见灶?”对曰:”夫日兼烛天下,一物不能当也;人君兼烛一国,一人不能拥也。故将见人主者梦见日。夫灶,一人炀焉,则后人无从见矣。今或者一人有炀君者乎?则臣虽梦见灶,不亦可乎!”

鲁哀公问于孔子曰:”鄙谚曰:’莫众而迷。’今寡人举事与群臣虑之,而国愈乱,其故何也?”孔子对曰:”明主之问臣,一人知之,一人不知也。如是者,明主在上,群臣直议于下。今群臣无不一辞同轨乎季孙者,举鲁国尽化为一,君虽问境内之人,犹不免于乱也。”

一曰:晏婴子聘鲁,哀公问曰:”语曰:’莫三人而迷。’今寡人与一国虑之,鲁不免于乱,何也?”晏子曰:”古之所谓’莫三人而迷’者,一人失之,二人得之,三人足以为众矣,故曰’莫三人而迷。’今鲁国之群臣以千百数,一言于季氏之私,人数非不众,所言者一人也,安得三哉?”

齐人有谓齐王曰:”河伯,大神也。王何不试与之遇乎?臣请使王遇之。”乃为坛场大水之上,而与王立之焉。有间,大鱼动,因曰:”此河伯。”

张仪欲以秦、韩与魏之势伐齐、荆,而惠施欲以齐、荆偃兵。二人争之。群臣左右皆为张子言,而以攻齐、荆为利,而莫为惠子言。王果听张子,而以惠子言为不可。攻齐、荆事已定,惠子入见。王言曰:”先生毋言矣。攻齐、荆之事果利矣,一国尽以为然。”惠子因说:”不可不察也。夫齐、荆之事也诚利,一国尽以为利,是何智者之众也?攻齐、荆之事诚不可利,一国尽以为利,何愚者之众也?凡谋者,疑也。疑也者,诚疑以为可者半,以为不可者半。今一国尽以为可,是王亡半也。劫主者,固亡其半者一也。”

叔孙相鲁,贵而主断。其所爱者曰竖牛,亦擅用叔孙之令。叔孙有子曰壬,竖牛妒而欲杀之,因与壬游于鲁君所。鲁君赐之玉环,壬拜受之而不敢佩,使竖牛请之叔孙。竖牛欺之曰:”吾已为尔请之矣,使尔佩之。”壬因佩之。竖牛因谓叔孙:”何不见壬于君乎?”叔孙曰:”孺子何足见也。”竖牛曰:”壬固已数见于君矣。君赐之玉环,壬已佩之矣。”叔孙召壬见之,而果佩之,叔孙怒而杀壬。壬兄曰丙,竖牛又妒而欲杀之。叔孙为丙铸钟,钟成,丙不敢击,使竖牛请之叔孙。竖牛不为请,又欺之曰:”吾已为尔请之矣,使尔击之。”丙因击之。叔孙闻之曰:”丙不请而擅击钟。”怒而逐之。丙出走齐,居一年,竖牛为谢叔孙,叔孙使竖牛召之,又不召而报之曰:”吾已召之矣,丙怒甚,不肯来。”叔孙大怒,使人杀之。二子已死,叔孙有病,竖牛因独养之而去左右,不内人,曰:”叔孙不欲闻人声。”因不食而饿杀。叔孙已死,竖牛因不发丧也,徙其府库重宝空之而奔齐。夫听所信之言而子父为人僇,此不参之患也。

江乙为魏王使荆,谓荆王曰:”臣入王之境内,闻王之国俗曰:’君子不蔽人之美,不言人之恶。’诚有之乎?”王曰:”有之。””然则若白公之乱,得庶无危乎?诚得如此,臣免死罪矣。”

卫嗣君重如耳,爱世姬,而恐其皆因其爱重以壅己也,乃贵薄疑以敌如耳,尊魏姬以耦世姬,曰:”以是相参也。”嗣君知欲无壅,而未得其术也。夫不使贱议贵,下必坐上,而必待势重之均也,而后敢相议,则是益树壅塞之臣也。嗣君之壅乃始。

夫矢来有乡,则积铁以备一乡;矢来无乡,则为铁室以尽备之。备之则体不伤。故彼以尽备之不伤,此以尽敌之无奸也。

庞恭与太子质于邯郸,谓魏王曰:”今一人言市有虎,王信之乎?”曰:”不信。””二人言市有虎,王信之乎?”曰:”不信。””三人言市有虎,王信之乎?”王曰:”寡人信之。”庞恭曰:”夫市之无虎也明矣,然而三人言而成虎。今邯郸之去魏也远于市,议臣者过于三人,愿王察之。”庞恭从邯郸反,竟不得见。

Share this:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *