Chapter 57 critiques overly interventionist governance and advocates wu wei (non-action) as the ideal political philosophy. Laozi argues that excessive laws, regulations, and control paradoxically create societal chaos, while simplicity, humility, and restraint from rulers foster natural harmony and prosperity.
A state may be ruled by (measures of) correction; weapons of war may be used with crafty dexterity; (but) the kingdom is made one’s own (only) by freedom from action and purpose.
How do I know that it is so? By these facts: – In the kingdom the multiplication of prohibitive enactments increases the poverty of the people; the more implements to add to their profit that the people have, the greater disorder is there in the state and clan; the more acts of crafty dexterity that men possess, the more do strange contrivances appear; the more display there is of legislation, the more thieves and robbers there are.
Therefore a sage has said, ‘I will do nothing (of purpose), and the people will be transformed of themselves; I will be fond of keeping still, and the people will of themselves become correct. I will take no trouble about it, and the people will of themselves become rich; I will manifest no ambition, and the people will of themselves attain to the primitive simplicity.’
Win the world through non-interference
Rule the state with simplicity, transparency, and moral consistency. Weapons of war only be used as a last resort. The highest form of governance aligns with the Dao’s spontaneity, avoiding forced control.
Critique of Over-Regulation
Excessive rules stifle creativity and impoverish people.
Proliferation of weapons fuels chaos.
Cunning tactics breed exploitation and artificial desires.
Overly detailed laws paradoxically increase crime by incentivizing loopholes and rebellion.
Four Principles of Wu Wei Governance:
“Non-Action”: Leaders refrain from micromanaging, allowing people to self-organize.
“Embrace stillness”: Stability arises when rulers avoid disruptive policies.
“Non-interference”: Economic prosperity flourishes with minimal state intervention.
“No desires”: Leaders model simplicity, curbing materialism and inspiring grassroots authenticity.
Mind cultivation vs social governance
Self-cultivation is akin to governing a nation. There are profound parallels between the macro principles of social governance and the micro-level practices of individual mind cultivation. The philosophies and principles of governance discussed above—such as wu wei (non-action), simplicity, and aligning with natural harmony—can be adapted to guide our personal spiritual journey and the inner governance of the heart-mind.
Leave a Reply