After being defeated by Cao Cao, Liu Bei fled south to Jingzhou (Jing Province) and sought refuge with the governor of Jingzhou, Liu Biao. Liu Biao not only sheltered Liu Bei and his remaining forces but also generously granted him a city to recuperate. Moreover, Liu Biao actively involved Liu Bei in the administration of Jing Province. However, Liu Bei eventually occupied Jing Province, leading many readers to question whether he betrayed Liu Biao.
A political alliance, Not a patron-client relationship
When Liu Biao offered refuge to Liu Bei, it was not an act of pure benevolence, nor was Liu Bei’s acceptance a gesture of humble submission. Rather, their relationship resembled a pragmatic political alliance – similar to that between Zhang Xiu and Liu Biao. Liu Biao provided Liu Bei with temporary shelter, troops, grain, and logistical support, while Liu Bei, in return, guarded Jing Province’s northern frontier and followed Liu Biao’s military directives.
In essence, Liu Bei functioned as a mercenary commander: he risked his life on the battlefield in exchange for sustenance and sanctuary. Mercenaries do not owe emotional gratitude – they earn their keep through service. If Liu Biao had refused to host him, Liu Bei would have sought other opportunities, as he had done throughout his turbulent career. Thus, Liu Bei did not “owe” Liu Biao in any moral sense; he sustained himself by selling his martial prowess.
Liu Bei declined Liu Biao’s offer
In 208 AD, Liu Biao, the Governor of Jing Province, fell seriously ill. On his deathbed, he entrusted the governance of Jing Province to Liu Bei, stating that his son Liu Cong was incapable and hoped Liu Bei would take over. Liu Biao said to Liu Bei,
“My son is unworthy, and my generals are all gone. After my death, you shall administer Jing Province.”
Liu Bei responded,
“Your sons are all capable. You need only focus on your recovery.”
Later, when someone advised Liu Bei to accept Jing Province, he firmly refused, saying,
“This man treated me with great kindness. If I were to act on his words now, people would consider me ungrateful. I cannot bear to do so.”
We have discussed this issue with more details in the following post about the reasons Liu Bei refused to take control of Jingzhou.
Restraint in the face of opportunity
Although Zhuge Liang’s Longzhong Plan clearly identified Jing and Yi provinces as essential bases for restoring the Han dynasty, Liu Bei never attempted to seize Jing Province while Liu Biao was alive. This restraint is well documented in historical records.
As recorded in the Records of the Three Kingdoms – Biography of the First Sovereign (Liu Bei):
“When Cao Cao marched south against Liu Biao, Liu Biao died. His son Liu Cong succeeded him and immediately sent envoys to surrender to Cao Cao. Liu Bei was stationed at Fancheng and did not know Cao Cao’s army was approaching until it reached Wancheng. He then led his followers southward. Passing by Xiangyang, Zhuge Liang urged him to attack Liu Cong and take Jing Province. Liu Bei replied, ‘I cannot bear to do it.’ He halted his horse and called out to Liu Cong, who was too frightened to come out. Many of Liu Cong’s retainers and people of Jing Province joined Liu Bei.”
This episode occurred in 208CE, shortly after Liu Biao’s death. Despite having a legitimate strategic motive – and even familial ties that Zhuge Liang was willing to override (Liu Cong’s stepmother was the sister of Zhuge Liang’s mother-in-law) – Liu Bei refused to strike.
Why? Because he lacked confidence in a swift victory, and Cao Cao’s main force was rapidly advancing. Attacking Xiangyang under such circumstances would have been reckless. While Zhuge Liang may have prioritized grand strategy, Liu Bei weighed immediate risks and long-term reputation.
Moral conduct amidst chaos
Even after Liu Cong betrayed the trust of his father’s legacy by surrendering to Cao Cao without resistance, Liu Bei still chose not to attack. He could have justified military action by claiming to restore loyalist rule or resist treason – but he did not. Instead, he fled south, and in doing so, attracted massive popular support: “Many of Liu Cong’s subordinates and people of Jing Province followed Liu Bei,” a testament to his widespread appeal and perceived righteousness.
Of course, the people’s choice was not solely because Liu Bei was good, but more because they feared Cao Cao’s atrocities. Cao Cao had massacred countless civilians in his campaigns, causing the deaths of countless innocent people. In Xu Province, when Tao Qian ignored Liu Bei’s advice and allied with Gongsun Zan to attack Cao Cao, it ended in a devastating defeat. Consumed by vengeance, Cao Cao quickly captured multiple cities, slaughtering hundreds of thousands of civilians. The people were well aware of Cao Cao’s ruthlessness, so when they heard he was about to rule Jing Province, they were filled with terror. In contrast, while Liu Bei also had an army, he did not easily slaughter innocent civilians. Thus, the people willingly followed Liu Bei in search of hope for survival.
It was only later – after the Battle of Red Cliffs, during the Nan Commandery campaign – that Liu Bei moved to secure the four southern commanderies (Wuling, Changsha, Guiyang, and Lingling). Crucially, by that time, these territories were effectively under Cao Cao’s nominal control, not Liu Biao’s or Liu Cong’s. Thus, Liu Bei was not seizing land from his former host but reclaiming it from a common enemy.
Benevolence within Realpolitik
Compared to the expectations of loyalty in a feudal patronage system, Liu Bei’s conduct toward Liu Biao was remarkably restrained and honorable.
Liu Bei honored his host while alive, they coexisted for over seven years, from 201CE to 208CE, without any overt conflict. This was truly remarkable during the turbulent late Eastern Han Dynasty, an era marked by warlord infighting. What’s more, Liu Bei refrained from opportunistic betrayal after his death, and only acted when the political landscape had fundamentally shifted.
In the ruthless world of the Three Kingdoms, where alliances were fleeting and betrayal commonplace, Liu Bei’s actions reflect a blend of strategic patience and performative virtue – one that served both his moral image and his long-term ambitions.
Far from lacking gratitude, Liu Bei demonstrated a nuanced understanding of honor within the bounds of survival and statecraft.
Leave a Reply