Mencius stresses shame as humanity’s moral baseline. Feeling ashamed of shamelessness awakens one’s conscience and eliminates disgrace. This teaching criticizes utilitarian, unscrupulous Warring States scholars and advocates inner integrity.
A man confuses Wuluzi by pitting survival needs against minor rituals. Mencius rejects this unequal comparison, using gold and wood analogies, and counters with immoral extreme acts to prove ritual morality must never be discarded for self-interest.
Zixia puts forward a balanced moral standard: never cross the line on core moral principles, yet allow flexibility for trivial daily etiquette. This dialectical view urges people to stick to major integrity while being lenient over minor flaws.
Zizhang lays four core standards for a true scholar: sacrifice life amid danger, weigh gains against righteousness, hold reverence in sacrifices, and feel sincere grief at funerals. These form the minimal moral baseline for Confucian intellectuals.
Mencius states scholars may take low-paid minor posts to escape poverty, as Confucius did managing stores and pastures. Two moral rules apply: low-ranking officials must not meddle in state affairs, while high officials shame themselves if they fail to uphold their ideals.
Mencius dismisses slander that Confucius lodged with influential eunuchs for office. He argues Confucius followed rites to serve and upheld righteousness to resign, choosing virtuous hosts even in peril to preserve uncompromised moral integrity.