Playing Go is a minor art; yet even so, you must give your whole attention to it to learn it.
Yi Qiu was known as the finest Go player in the country. When he taught two students, one devoted his full attention to the master’s instructions. The other, though seemingly listening, let his mind wander to a flock of swans flying overhead, imagining his bow and arrow ready to shoot them. Though both learned from the same teacher, the second student’s skill paled in comparison.
Was this due to inferior intelligence? The answer is no.
Allegorical Meaning
The Primacy of Focus
The parable underscores that innate talent matters less than concentrated effort. Both students received identical instruction, yet their outcomes diverged radically because of their degree of attention.
Self-Sabotage Through Distraction
The underperforming student’s failure stemmed not from inability but from divided focus — his mental energy was squandered on fantasies (the swans) rather than the task at hand.
Mencius’ Pedagogical Warning
This story critiques half-hearted learning. It argues that wisdom and skill accumulate only through undivided commitment, echoing the text’s broader theme: human potential is unlocked not by nature alone but by disciplined cultivation.
Universal Applicability
Beyond ancient China, the lesson resonates in modern contexts: mastery in any field — whether art, science, or ethics — demands rejecting distractions to engage deeply with one’s purpose.
Leave a Reply