Mencius said:
“Shun was born in Zhufeng, moved to Fuxia, and died in Mingtiao – he was a man of the Eastern Yi (eastern frontier peoples).
King Wen of Zhou was born in Qizhou and died in Biying – he was a man of the Western Yi (western frontier peoples).”
“Their homelands were over a thousand li apart, and their lifetimes separated by more than a thousand years.
Yet when each gained influence and implemented their vision in the Central States, their ways matched as perfectly as two halves of a tally token.Thus, the ancient sages and later sages all followed the same fundamental standard.”
孟子曰：「舜生於諸馮，遷於負夏，卒於鳴條，東夷之人也。文王生於岐周，卒於畢郢，西夷之人也。地之相去也，千有餘里；世之相後也，千有餘歲。得志行乎中國，若合符節。先聖後聖，其揆一也。」
Note
Though Shun and King Wen came from different regions and eras, their governance principles aligned completely – showing that the Way of the sages is universal, timeless, and transcends geography and history.
This passage from Mencius: Li Lou II articulates a core Confucian belief: sages across time and space share one unchanging moral truth, thereby grounding Confucianism’s claim to universal validity.
Challenging cultural elitism
In pre-Qin China, “Yi” (barbarians) implied cultural inferiority. By identifying both Shun and King Wen as “Yi,” Mencius subverts ethnocentrism: virtue, not birthplace, defines civilization. Moral greatness can emerge from the margins.
The Objectivity of Dao
The “tally token” metaphor illustrates perfect congruence between Shun’s and King Wen’s conduct. This implies the Confucian “Way” or “Dao” (benevolent governance, filial piety, ritual order, people-centered rule) is not subjective invention but an objective moral order that sages discover and enact.
Constructing the Confucian “Lineage of Dao”
By linking Shun (legendary sage-king) and King Wen (founder of Zhou virtue), Mencius forges a moral continuum across millennia, positioning himself as heir to this tradition. This idea later evolved into Han Yu’s and Zhu Xi’s formal “Dao-tong” (Transmission of Dao) narrative.
A response to Warring States chaos
Amid rampant relativism and power politics in the Warring States era, Mencius insists: disorder stems not from the absence of the Way/Dao, but from its neglect. The solution lies not in new doctrines, but in returning to the eternal principles practiced by past sages.
Contrast with Mohist and Daoist Views
Mohists rejected Zhou rituals; Daoists saw morality as historically relative. Mencius counters: true ethics are universal and unchanging – a stance that fortified Confucianism against moral relativism.
Universal values and Civilizational confidence
Mencius reminds us that core human values – compassion, justice, responsibility – resonate across cultures and epochs. A civilization’s legitimacy rests not on antiquity or power, but on its fidelity to these shared principles – a message vital for today’s global dialogue.
In essence: Sages differ in time and place, but their hearts beat as one; the Dao abides in the world, unchanged by distance or centuries.
Leave a Reply