Gongsun Chou asked, “The Book of Poetry says, ‘One should not eat idly.’ Why is it that a gentleman does not plow the fields yet still receives food?”
Mencius replied, “When a gentleman resides in a state, if the monarch employs him, the state will be secure, the people prosperous, the monarch honored, and the state glorious. If the young people follow his teachings, they will be filial to their parents, respectful to their elders, loyal, and trustworthy. When it comes to ‘not eating idly,’ what contribution could possibly be greater than this?”
Note
This passage from the Jin Xin I chapter of the Mencius is a brilliant defense of “social division of labor” and “the value of intellectuals.” Drawing on historical context and Confucian classics, we can understand its underlying thought through the following dimensions:
- The Social Division of Labor Between Mental and Physical Work: The Rationality of “Eating Without Plowing”
During the Warring States period, with the rise of the scholar class, a distinction emerged between “those who labor with their minds” and “those who labor with their strength.” Gongsun Chou represented a naive egalitarian view, believing that one who does not farm should not eat. Mencius, however, clearly articulated the necessity of social division of labor. He pointed out that although gentlemen (intellectuals/politicians) do not directly produce grain, they create immense social value by governing the state and educating the people. This division of labor and cooperation is the very foundation upon which human society operates. - The Creation of Spiritual and Institutional Wealth: “Security, Prosperity, Honor, and Glory” and “Filial Piety, Fraternal Duty, Loyalty, and Trustworthiness”
Mencius clearly defines the two core functions of a gentleman: politically, assisting the monarch in achieving “security, prosperity, honor, and glory” (order and prosperity at the national level); and in social education, cultivating the youth to practice “filial piety, fraternal duty, loyalty, and trustworthiness” (morality and ethics at the societal level). Mencius uses this to illustrate that what gentlemen create is “intangible wealth” – a healthy political ecology and a noble social ethos. The value of these spiritual and institutional contributions far exceeds the grain produced by a few acres of land. - Redefining “Not Eating Idly”: The Sublimation of “Value”
Gongsun Chou quotes the Book of Poetry (“One should not eat idly”) to question the gentleman, but Mencius cleverly turns the argument around by redefining what it means to “not eat idly.” In Mencius’ view, truly “eating idly” means contributing nothing to society. Since a gentleman uses his wisdom and moral teachings to benefit the world, his contribution is so immense that no one can surpass it. This not only affirms the social status of intellectuals but also represents a profound sublimation of the concept of “labor value,” establishing the Confucian noble mission of “saving the world through the Way.”
公孙丑曰：“诗曰‘不素餐兮’，君子之不耕而食，何也？”
孟子曰：“君子居是国也，其君用之，则安富尊荣；其子弟从之，则孝弟忠信。‘不素餐兮’，孰大于是？”
Leave a Reply