In the treacherous world of the Three Kingdoms, where brilliant minds often met tragic ends, Jia Xu stands as a singular anomaly—a strategist famed not for grand visions of empire, but for ruthless pragmatism and cold calculation, yet he emerged as one of the very few who lived to a ripe old age and died in peace. While countless other advisors perished by the sword, poison, or political purge, Jia Xu navigated the chaos with uncanny foresight, offering advice that was often morally dubious yet strategically sound.
His story, drawn from both historical records like the Records of the Three Kingdoms and Luo Guanzhong’s Romance of the Three Kingdoms, reveals a man who understood power not as a moral contest, but as a game of survival.
Saving Li Jue and Guo Si – A ruthless beginning
Jia Xu’s first major appearance in history came in the aftermath of Dong Zhuo’s assassination in 192 AD. With Dong Zhuo dead at the hands of Lü Bu and Wang Yun, his former generals Li Jue and Guo Si fled in panic, believing their cause lost and their lives forfeit. In their despair, they prepared to scatter and flee, hoping to avoid capture and execution.
It was then that Jia Xu intervened. He famously advised them:
“You plan to flee alone—what will you do if a minor magistrate captures you? Instead, gather Dong Zhuo’s scattered troops, march on Chang’an, avenge your lord, and seize control of the court. If it fails, then flee—but don’t surrender now.”
— Romance of the Three Kingdoms, Chapter 9
This counsel was not noble or righteous; it was pure survivalism. By rallying the remnants of Dong Zhuo’s army, Li Jue and Guo Si not only avoided death but seized the Han capital, murdered Wang Yun, drove Lü Bu into exile, and installed Emperor Xian as their puppet. Though their rule was brutal and short-lived, Jia Xu had proven his worth: he could turn certain defeat into temporary victory.
Yet, unlike Li Jue and Guo Si—who eventually turned on each other and were destroyed—Jia Xu wisely distanced himself from their infighting, preserving his own life and reputation.
The battle of Wancheng: A two-stage victory
Jia Xu later served Zhang Xiu, a minor warlord based in Wancheng. When Cao Cao invited Zhang Xiu to surrender, Jia Xu advised compliance—another move of pragmatic realignment. But Cao Cao, in a moment of personal indiscretion, took Zhang Xiu’s aunt (wife of Zhang Ji, Zhang Xiu’s uncle) as a concubine, deeply humiliating Zhang Xiu.
Enraged, Zhang Xiu launched a surprise night attack on Cao Cao’s camp. The assault was devastating—Cao Cao lost his eldest son Cao Ang, his nephew Cao Anmin, and his trusted general Dian Wei. Victorious, Zhang Xiu wanted to pursue the retreating army.
But Jia Xu stopped him:
“Do not pursue. If you do, you will be defeated.”
Zhang Xiu ignored him and attacked—only to be routed by Cao Cao’s rearguard.
Humbled, Zhang Xiu returned and asked Jia Xu:
“You were right. But now, after we’ve been beaten, why do you say we should attack again?”
Jia Xu replied with a masterclass in psychological warfare:
“Cao Cao is a brilliant general. His retreat is not out of weakness, but necessity—likely due to unrest in his base. So, when he retreats, he leaves his best troops to guard the rear. That’s why you lost. But now, having repelled you, he’ll assume you’re too demoralized to attack again. He’ll leave weaker forces behind. Strike now, and you will win.”
Zhang Xiu followed the advice—and won a decisive victory.
This episode, recounted in both Chen Shou’s Sanguozhi and Luo Guanzhong’s dramatized version, showcases Jia Xu’s deep understanding of human psychology and military logic—a mind that could predict not just movements, but motivations.
The succession crisis: The silence that made an emperor
Perhaps Jia Xu’s most consequential moment came during the succession struggle between Cao Pi and Cao Zhi, sons of Cao Cao. The court was divided. Many advisors, like Yang Xiu, openly backed Cao Zhi. When Cao Cao discovered this, he had Yang Xiu executed—a stark warning that this was family business, not a political contest.
Cao Pi, fearing he might suffer the same fate, secretly consulted Jia Xu. Instead of plotting or scheming, Jia Xu offered a simple, profound piece of advice:
“Be a good son. Practice filial piety, be humble, and stay out of intrigue. Your father is a wise man—he sees through deception.”
Later, when Cao Cao himself asked Jia Xu which son should succeed him, Jia Xu did not answer directly. Instead, he said:
“I was just thinking about Yuan Shao and Liu Biao.”
Cao Cao laughed—because he understood. Both Yuan Shao and Liu Biao had bypassed their eldest sons in favor of younger, favored ones—and both died with their families torn apart by civil war.
Jia Xu’s silence and subtle reference sealed Cao Pi’s fate as heir. By invoking the disasters of Yuan and Liu, he reminded Cao Cao that stability mattered more than preference.
When Cao Pi ascended the throne in 220 AD, he never forgot Jia Xu’s role. He appointed him Grand Commandant (Taiwei), one of the highest positions in the state—a rare honor for a man who had once advised Dong Zhuo’s killers.
Tragic fate of other strategists
Jia Xu’s peaceful death at the age of 77 stands in stark contrast to the fates of so many other brilliant minds in the Three Kingdoms era:
- Xun Yu, Cao Cao’s most trusted strategist, opposed the move toward imperial usurpation. In response, Cao Cao sent him an empty food box—a symbolic command to commit suicide.
- Chen Gong, who once helped Cao Cao gain control of Yan Province, later followed Lü Bu. Captured by Cao Cao, he refused to surrender and died with dignity.
- Tian Feng, Yuan Shao’s loyal advisor, warned against the campaign at Guandu. After Yuan Shao’s defeat, he was executed out of shame and anger.
- Lu Su and Lu Xun, both pillars of Wu, faced suspicion and pressure over succession disputes. Lu Xun, in particular, was harassed into illness and death by Sun Quan for his stance.
In a world where loyalty, brilliance, or moral integrity often led to death, Jia Xu survived by refusing to be loyal to any cause beyond self-preservation, by never overreaching, and by knowing when to speak—and when to remain silent.
The virtue of pragmatism in a time of chaos
Jia Xu was not a hero. He did not dream of restoring the Han, nor did he seek to build a just kingdom. He was a realist in an age of idealism and ambition, a man who offered “bad moves” only in the moral sense—but brilliant moves in the strategic one.
His survival was not luck. It was the result of profound psychological insight, emotional restraint, and an unflinching understanding of power dynamics. While others died for principles, Jia Xu lived by principles of survival.
In the end, Jia Xu’s legacy is not in the empires he built, but in the storms he weathered—a testament to the idea that sometimes, the wisest move is not to win, but to live to see the next day.
Leave a Reply