-
Han Feizi – Chapter 36.7
This Han Feizi ‑ Chapter 36.7 challenges Xi Xianzi’s claim of “sharing the blame”. It analyzes the wartime‑execution episode, holding his proposal for public exposure only multiplies injustice instead of shouldering real responsibility.
-
Han Feizi – Chapter 36.5
This Han Feizi ‑ Chapter 36.5 critiques the well‑known Shi Kuang anecdote. It argues Duke Ping violated ruler‑principles and Shi Kuang breached ministerial etiquette, as ministers should remonstrate verbally instead of using physical force.
-
Han Feizi – Chapter 36.4
This Han Feizi ‑ Chapter 36.4 disputes Confucius’ praise for Zhao Xiangzi’s reward of Gao He. It holds rewards must tie to concrete merit; merely observing basic ruler‑minister etiquette should not win top‑ranked recompense.
-
Han Feizi – Chapter 36.3
This Han Feizi ‑ Chapter 36.3 critiques Guan Zhong’s advice to Duke Huan. It argues merely dismissing treacherous favorites is insufficient; sound institutions and reliable reward‑punishment systems are needed to block ministerial usurpation.
-
Han Feizi – Chapter 36.2
This Han Feizi ‑ Chapter 36.2 advances the famous spear and shield paradox. It critiques Confucian moral example governance via Yao and Shun tales, arguing institutional rewards punishments outperform sages’ personal toil.