Duke Wen of Teng asked Mencius:
“The people of Qi are building a fortress at Xue, and I am deeply afraid. What should I do?”
Mencius replied:
“In ancient times, King Tai (Gugong Danfu) lived in Bin, but the Di tribes kept invading. He had no choice but to leave and settle at the foot of Mount Qi – not because he preferred it, but out of necessity.
Yet even in exile, he never ceased doing good. Because of this, his descendants later produced true kings – King Wen and King Wu of Zhou!
A noble person establishes a legacy not for immediate success, but so that future generations may carry it forward. Whether that legacy ultimately triumphs – that is up to Heaven.
Now, facing Qi’s threat, what can you truly do?
Simply strive your utmost to do good. That is all.”
滕文公問曰：「齊人將築薛，吾甚恐。如之何則可？」
孟子對曰：「昔者大王居邠，狄人侵之，去之岐山之下居焉。非擇而取之，不得已也。苟為善，後世子孫必有王者矣。君子創業垂統，為可繼也。若夫成功，則天也。君如彼何哉？彊為善而已矣。」
Note
This dialogue comes from Mencius: King Hui of Liang II. It is set during the Warring States period, when the small state of Teng (in present-day Tengzhou, Shandong) was squeezed between major powers like Qi and Chu, teetering on the brink of survival.
In the previous article, when Duke Wen of Teng asked Mencius whether to rely on a powerful state for self-preservation, Mencius advocated self-reliance and the implementation of benevolent governance to win the support of the people.
Qi’s construction of a fortified city at Xue – a former minor state later absorbed by Qi – was clearly an act of military intimidation aimed at encroaching on Teng’s territory. Duke Wen of Teng’s fear epitomizes the helplessness commonly felt by weaker states confronting hegemonic threats.
Upholding morality in adversity
Rather than advising diplomatic intrigue, alliances, or military buildup, Mencius recounted what seemed like a “passive” story – the migration of King Tai (Gugong Danfu) to escape Di tribal invasions. Yet this was not cowardice, but a morally grounded strategy of strategic retreat:
- King Tai avoided a futile battle for short-term victory, instead preserving his people and relocating;
- Crucially, even in exile, he never abandoned “doing good” – continuing benevolent governance and moral education;
- Precisely because of this steadfast virtue, three generations later the Zhou clan rose to overthrow the Shang dynasty and establish an 800-year legacy.
Through this example, Mencius conveyed to Duke Wen of Teng: true state-building lies not in territorial size, but in leaving behind a legacy of virtuous rule that future generations can inherit.
“Simply strive your utmost to do good”
Faced with an unchangeable external threat (Qi’s fortification), Mencius acknowledged human limits (“What can you do about them?”). Yet he rejected resignation, proposing instead an inner agency – “strive your utmost to do good” (Confucian active pessimism):
- To exert every effort;
- Practice benevolent governance: light taxes, care for elders and children, promotion of education;
- Whether success follows is left to “Heaven” (historical conditions and timing) – but the moral act itself holds intrinsic value.
This echoes Mencius: Jin Xin I:
“All is fate; yet one should accept it in the right way.”
Though destiny is beyond control, one must respond with moral integrity.
“Founding a legacy” vs. Short-term survival tactics
While the Warring States era favored the Diplomatists’ cunning, such as the Vertical Alliance vs. Horizontal Alliance strategy, and the Legalists’ “enrich the state, strengthen the army” doctrine, Mencius took the opposite path. He argued:
- A small state seeking only to survive will inevitably be swallowed up;
- But if it governs with benevolence, even if conquered, its moral spirit may inspire future generations (as King Tai inspired King Wen of Zhou);
- True political continuity lies not in bloodline or land, but in the transmission of moral principles (dao tong).
This reflects the Confucian value of “prioritizing the Dao/Tao over power” – moral authority endures longer than brute force.
Leave a Reply