A man who was born blind wanted to know what the sun looked like, so he asked others to describe it.
“It looks like this, like a bronze disc,” said one, rapping a gong as he spoke. Some time later, when the blind man heard a gong, he said, ”Isn’t that the sun?”
Another told him, “The sun has light like this candle,” and let him feel the candle. Some time later, the blind man picked up a flute and exclaimed, ”Ah! This is surely the sun.”
A sun is a far cry from a gong or a flute, but the blind cannot make out the difference because they cannot see and have to ask others.
Allegorical Meaning
Su Shi’s parable dismantles the limitations of secondhand knowledge and abstract theory divorced from direct experience, arguing true understanding requires embodied engagement with reality.
The Blind Men’s Fallacy
He mistook fragmented sensory proxies for the sun’s essence twice. This satirizes:
- Scholars debating nature through ancient texts alone
- Reducing complex truths to literal metaphors
Modern Relevance
- Education: Knowledge taught via rote memorization fail at applied problem-solving. Education sometimes breeds impractical thinkers.
- Media Literacy: Mistaking viral narratives (metaphors) for complex realities (the sun).
In an age of fragmented information, Su Shi’s parable remains a manifesto: Truth isn’t transferred — it’s lived. The sun (reality) can only be known by stepping into its light.
Leave a Reply