A man walking along the river bank saw someone about to throw a small boy into the water. The child was screaming with terror.
”Why do you want to throw that child into the river?” asked the passer-by.
“His father is a good swimmer,” was the answer.
But it does not follow that the son of a good swimmer can swim.
Allegorical Meaning
This fable from Master Lü’s Spring and Autumn Annals satirizes the deadly fallacy of inherited traits and declares: Wisdom dies where critical thinking stops.
The Perverted Logic of Heredity
The father’s reasoning — “This child’s father excels at swimming, therefore the child must inherently swim well” — exposes a catastrophic category error:
- Confusing Potential with Competence: Genetic predisposition does not equal instant skill mastery.
- Ignoring Developmental Reality: A newborn lacks muscle memory, lung capacity, or neurological readiness for swimming.
This mirrors humanity’s eternal flaw: mistaking correlation for causation.
The Violence of Unquestioned Tradition
The act of throwing the infant symbolizes:
- Blind Transfer of Legacy: Forcing the next generation to replicate the past without adaptation.
- Ritual Over Reason: Sacrificing individuality at the altar of ancestral worship.
Developmental Contempt: “The Infant Can’t Cry Loud Enough”
The baby’s screams are ignored — a haunting metaphor for:
- Systemic Erasure of Youth Agency: Dismissing new voices as “inexperienced noise.”
- Generational Narcissism: Parents projecting their achievements onto children (“My success is your destiny”).
This foreshadows modern crises: burnout in hyper-competitive education, mental health collapse under parental expectations.
Leave a Reply