A scholar, hard-pressed for money, listed a few hundred of his books, packed them up, and set out for the capital, intending to sell them.
On his way he met another scholar who looked at his list and wanted to buy them. But he could not afford the price. He happened to have a few pieces of ancient bronze at home which he intended to
sell for rice. So he took the other to see them. The one who wanted to sell his books was a great admirer of bronze, and was delighted with these specimens.
“No need to sell them,” he told the other. ”We can weigh the price of the books against the bronze and see if we can’t do an exchange.”
The outcome was that he deposited his books with the other and left with a load of bronze.
When he reached home, his wife was surprised to see him back so soon. Looking quickly at his bags, she found they were full of some hard objects which clanged when shifted about. When she heard the
story, she began to scold.
”You fool!” she exclaimed. ”What do you want these things for when we have no rice in the house?”
“He’s in the same fix,” replied the husband, cheerfully. ”With the books he has from me, he won’t have any rice to eat for some time either!”
Allegorical Meaning
This parable critiques the self-deluding nature of intellectual vanity and the disconnect between scholarly pursuits and material survival.
The Illusion of Value Exchange
Both scholars believe they’ve gained precious assets:
- Book Collector values “antique bronzes” (intellectual prestige)
- Bronze Owner values books (scholarly capital)
Yet neither recognizes their treasures are mutually useless for survival. Their transaction symbolizes academia’s detachment from practical needs.
Scholarly Myopia vs. Domestic Reality
The wife’s outburst embodies grounded wisdom. Her focus on sustenance contrasts with her husband’s abstract obsession.
The Poverty of “Cultural Capital”
- Books = hollow scholarly ambition
- Bronzes = empty cultural status
Both men trade real resources (savings, heirlooms) for symbolic capital that cannot feed them. The story mocks literati who prioritize “elegant obsessions” over survival.
Self-Awareness through Mirroring
The scholar’s retort (“He’s in the same fix, he faces starvation too!”) reveals his tragic flaw: equating shared delusion with justification.
The scholar’s reply unconsciously diagnoses the folly: his realization that the bronze owner also can’t eat books should have exposed their shared error. Instead, it becomes perverse validation—a warning about confirmation bias in intellectual circles.
Leave a Reply